Case Results
Attorney David D. Diamond is a State Bar Certified Criminal Law Specialist. His decades of experience are exactly what you need to overcome your criminal charges.
Case Results Obtained By Law Offices of David D. Diamond
Take a look at some of our previous results dealing with restraining orders:
Case Name | Our Client | Type of TRO | Result | Court Location |
| V.S. vs L.P. | Respondent | Civil Harassment | Dismissed | LASC- Compton |
| M.K. vs J.K. | Respondent | Civil Harassment | Dismissed | LASC- Burbank |
| J.W. vs S.S. | Respondent | Civil Harassment | Dismissed | LASC- Santa Monica |
| W vs. M | Respondent | Civil Harassment | Dismissed | Rancho Cucamonga |
| F vs. M. | Respondent | Domestic Violence | Dismissed | LASC-Pomona |
| A.J. vs A.H. | Respondent | Civil Harassment | Dismissed | LASC-Compton |
| A.B. vs J.O. | Petitioner | Civil Harassment | RO Obtained | LASC-Pomona |
| S.W. v. J.G. | Petitioner | Domestic Violence | Successfully modified terms for more protection and increased order to 5 years | LASC- Burbank |
| L.C.v. B.B. | Petitioner and Cross-Respondent | Domestic Violence | Prevailed at hearing, 5 year order granted and attorneys fees | LASC- Van Nuys |
| C.M. v S.L. | Petitioner | Civil Harassment - APPEAL | Affirmed Restraining Order | District Court of Appeals |
| A.G. v J.W. | Respondent | Domestic Violence | Case Dismissed | LASC-Central |
| H.C v R.M. | Respondent | Civil Harassment | Case Dismissed | LASC-Central |
| J.Q. v A.V. | Respondent | Domestic Violence | Case Dismissed, Petition Denied | LASC- North District |
| B.R. v S.P. | Respondent | Civil Harassment | Case Dismissed, Petition Denied | LASC- West District |
| M.L. v V.W. | Respondent | Civil Harassment | Case Dismissed, Petition Quashed | LASC- Central Branch |
| M.L. v R.W. | Respondent | Civil Harassment | Case Dismissed, Petition Quashed | LASC- Central Branch |
| T.S. v M.B. | Petitioner | Domestic Violence | PRO Issued, fees awarded | LASC- Central Branch |
| L.H. v M.K. | Petitioner | Domestic Violence | Stipulated PRO Ordered | Orange County Superior Court |
| G.R. v. A.S. | Respondent | Civil Harassment | No permanent order issued | LASC- Central Branch |
| S.S. v. C.M. | Petitioner | Domestic Violence | Stay away stipulation | LASC-West Branch |
| S.M. v. R.M. | Petitioner/Respondent | Domestic Violence | Stay away mutual stipulation | LASC- East District |
| Y.A. v. J.F. | Respondent | Domestic Violence | No Perm. Order Issued | Merced Superior Court |
| T.O. v. G.P. | Respondent | Domestic Violence | No Perm. Order Issued | LACS- North District |
| T.M. v. M.V. | Petitioner | Domestic Violence | Permanent order issued | LASC- Central |
| M.H. v. J.G. | Respondent | Civil Harassment | Mutual Stay Away Agreed | LASC- Southwest Branch |
| J.G. v. S.G. | Respondent | Domestic Violence | No Perm. Order Issued | LACS- Central |
| A.G. v. S.M. | Respondent | Domestic Violence | No Perm. Order Issued | LASC- Central |
| T.P. v. H.M. | Respondent | Domestic Violence | No Perm. Order Issued | LASC- Central |
| M.T. v. G.T. | Respondent | Domestic Violence | Mutual Stay Away | LASC- North District |
| M.S. v. M.S. | Respondent | Domestic Violence | Mediated Joint Resolution | LASC- Central |
| R.K. v P.K. | Respondent | Domestic Violence | Negotiated MUTUAL stay-away | Orange County Superior Court |
| P.R. v. M.M. | Respondent | Domestic Violence | No Perm. Order Issued | LASC- Central Branch |
| L.M. v A.I. | Respondent | Domestic Violence | No permanent orders issued | LASC- Burbank Branch |
| R.B. v. K.P. | Respondent | Civil Harassment | No Perm. Order Issued | LASC- Burbank Branch |
| T.E. v. L.K. | Respondent | Civil Harassment | No Perm. Order Issued | LASC- Central Branch |
| J.A. v. T. L. | Respondent | Civil Harassment | No Perm. Order Issued | LASC- Pasadena Branch |
| S.R. v J.K. | Respondent | Civil Harassment | PRO denied after full hearing | LASC- Van Nuys Branch |
| E.R. v S.M. | Respondent | Civil Harassment | PRO denied | LASC- East District |
| J.H. v L.P. | Respondent | Civil Harassment | TRO AND PRO denied | LASC- Central Branch |
| J.H. v L.P. | Respondent | Domestic Violence | TRO and PRO denied | LASC- Central Branch |
| J.C. v S.G. | Petitioner | Civil Harassment | Negotiated a Stipulated Stay-Away | LASC- Glendale |
| A.H. v D.D. | Petitioner and Cross-Respondent | Domestic Violence | Negotiated a MUTUAL Stay-Away | LASC- West Branch |
-
Firm News -
What to Expect
-
Resources
Client Reviews
-
“I've seen a lot of attorneys throughout my years, and I have to say you're one of the best I've seen. I thought you were organized, you were prepared, you had great arguments, you had a great composure with this jury. Your legal research was spot on.”Los Angeles Superior Court Judge, Compton Branch, Robbery-Gang Trial
-
“Great Job, Dave! You will always be my first call... But in fairness, I hope I will never need your services again.”Rob P.
-
“Words cannot express the gratitude our family has for David Diamond and his staff. My spouse was falsely accused of stalking and caused extreme stress on our family. The case was dismissed. David Diamond is passionate and knowledgeable about the law.”Mary M.
-
“I am very thankful to have such a great, caring, and knowledgeable attorney such as David Diamond. He set my mind at ease and helped me through the entire process. Please do yourself a favor and call him if you are ever in need of a DUI attorney.”J.M.
-
“David, I wanted to write and let you know how extraordinarily pleased I was with the outcome of my case; you truly work miracles! I wouldn't hesitate to recommend you to anyone I know. Again, thank you for all your hard work and support, you're the best!”B.B.
-
“There are no words that we say to show you how completely grateful we are to you, will always be remembered in this family.”The G Family
-
“Thank you so much for all of your help! I hope none of our family has to go through an appeal, but if they do, with great confidence, I would be happy to recommend you! Thank you again!”C.M.
-
“I would like to thank you for your professionalism, dedication and favorable results in my case. I appreciate knowing and being able to count on your firm. If I ever need your services in another case, I will not hesitate to call you.”E. S.
